Typical

Like I said, Dew's new hack was probably going to lead to a swift ban. There are already a decent number of people reporting bans for it. In response to these reports, Dew made the claims:

 Originally Posted by Vuno 

If you got banned for 72 hours, that wasn't my hack. Chances are, your friends were too dumb to know not to use camera lock so much. It is obvious they were hacking.

These bans are more and likely caused by:
Using other hacks
Obvious of hacks being used
The hack was once detected at a time

 Originally Posted by Vuno 

Someone told me the camera lock doesn't work all the time. Maybe that was it.

and then later, when people asked for the topic to be renamed to "[DETECTED]" and asked him when he was going to address the problem with an update and fix his coding

 Originally Posted by Vuno 

I'm kinda losing my interest of hacking again. Idk.

 Originally Posted by Vuno 

 Originally Posted by ice.cream 

The thread title should be renamed to [detected].

Or maybe the camera lock needs to be fixed.

 Originally Posted by Vuno 

I haven't felt the urge to create new features or fix the camera lock bug. Losing my interest . Once I feel the internet coming back, I'll add more features. Until then, have fun with it.

lulz. Never-ending entertainment. Not that I actually think anyone really bought his "private hack", but once again, let this and the previous post(s) I've made on Dew be a reminder to never buy his shit -- even if it's the only hack available.

My guess is that Dew was handed, or used public knowledge, the method for a 'camera lock' feature, and did an absolutely terrible job of coding and implementing it.

I also find it funny that some people think it's okay to charge insane prices for a standard game hack just because competition is slim. This is not only in bad taste, but profiteering/price-gouging while they have a passive monopoly. I haven't been paying attention to this stuff recently, but I have noted from a few posts I've read when lurking certain forums that the 'market' is a lot more expensive. I'll have to think about that. Is this due to the recent litigation drama from Blizzard? Probably not; dudes just wanna abuse the situation so they can add to their Disney World savings fund. You know how I feel about that, but if you charge more for your hack than the actual game costs... well, you should probably lower it a bit. Preferably $0 unless you want Blizzard to rightfully sue you into the ground.